Case Studies
(All names have been changed)
From
"Ready to Demote" to "High Potential"
Bob Frey, a Sales Manager, in
this new role for 18 months, had several sales reps with less than one
year in the job. Having completed management training and being
seen as high potential, Bob was in jeopardy of being demoted
or terminated because critical territories and accounts were
losing sales. While he has made regular site visits and phone
contact with his reps, he had no indications of any issues with
his reps. Conversations with the reps of the vulnerable territories
had no results.
Bob engaged in MFS and
discovered that the new reps in the critical territories were
reluctant to disclose their loss of motivation. Bob’s
position was, "If I don’t hear from you, I assume everything
is OK." The rep's reaction when they were in trouble was to
withdraw rather than reach out. Before engaging in the MFS process,
they never talked about their assumptions and "ground rules".
MFS established agreements about how and when to communicate with
each other. The outcome after 6 months was increased sales, recapture
of accounts, and Bob being placed back on the high potential list
for sales executives.
Including opportunity
costs and cost-avoidance, the ROI for using the MFS process was
approximately 30:1.
"A
Better Fit ~ Career Realignment"
Diane Brooks, a newly appointed
manager, was experiencing difficulty with developing her team. She spent
too much time on details and giving instructions. Team members relied
on Diane to make various decisions that they were capable of making
and should have been making themselves. The data and conversation
from the MFS process revealed that Diane had tendencies to
second-guess decisions made by team members and this sent a message
that they couldn’t be trusted.
As a result, Diane
realized that she really didn’t want to be a manager in the
first place and had taken the promotion only for the money and to
avoid being seen as lacking ambition by upper management. The outcome
was a reassignment of Diane to an individual contributor role
that benefited her and the organization. The team was restructured;
no promotions or replacements were required to fulfill the manager’s
responsibilities. The organization retained a technically talented
individual, saved compensation costs, and enabled the team to work
in a more productive environment. A $5,000 investment resulted in
a cost savings of over $100,000, a 20:1 ROI.
"Got
a Life ~ Work/Family Balance with Business Results"
Sam Blake, a high level manager
accepts a leadership position with an internal technical service/support
team of 35 people. The team has a 60% turnover, client satisfaction
is low, and technical change is a top priority. Sam wants his
team to become more cohesive and self-managing. Team members
have the capability and willingness to achieve this desire. Sam also
wants to reduce his 14-hour, 6-day workweek to more reasonable
demands so he can spend more time with his family and have less
stress.
As a direct result of
engaging in the MFS process, his work team developed a better way
of coordinating functions and servicing internal client groups.
A year later, Sam had a work team that required little of his
time and was able to solve problems and make decisions on their
own. Turnover dropped to zero and Sam was able to spend more time
at a strategic level, developing clearer priorities and direction
for serving the business and was able to enjoy the company of his
family for dinner almost every evening.
After 2 years, turnover
remained at zero, and Sam’s time was consumed by strategic
issues and not wasted on administrative details. Sam was
subsequently reassigned to another function and not replaced in
the department. His estimate is that the MFS process resulted in
at least a 25:1 return on investment.
"The
Best Can Get Better"
David Morris, a senior executive
with International Marketing and Business Development responsibility,
has long tenure with his company and a stellar reputation in his
functional and managerial role. He also has responsibility for developing
and mentoring young, high potential MBA’s as they rotate through
various divisions in their career development.
This exceptional executive
went through the MFS process and his results were extremely positive;
they indicated a high degree of agreement with meeting the needs
of his people. The staff experienced him as an exceptional manager
and leader. However, the data indicated he needed to slow down a
little when giving instructions and check for people’s understanding
of his directions. Apparently, his people felt reluctant to ask
him to repeat and clarify messages because they didn’t want
to waste his time or appear stupid. Consequently, sometimes his
staff would not accurately complete some assignments.
During the group discussion,
David agreed to spend a little more time confirming their
understandings of his expectations. He kept this commitment and
the result was less rework needed by the staff, less follow up by
David, and faster development of the high potentials.
In this case, the MFS
process resulted in an estimated overall 15:1 ROI.
|