Most
appraisal systems rely on observations from immediate supervisors
and emphasize what was accomplished in meeting a boss' requirements.
Some assess how results were achieved through interactive processes.
Yet, the systems rely predominantly on the boss' observations
and assessments. This information may be valid from the boss's
perspective, but it may not provide an accurate picture of the
real needs and perceptions of the work group the manager influences.
Typically, performance
appraisals are seen as merely a requirement for administrative and
salary decisions. While the results are usually used for that purpose,
real payoff occurs when the primary focus is on development and
growth. There is, in fact, a growing awareness that the traditional
approach to performance appraisals is probably dysfunctional and
counterproductive.
Some pioneering organizations
are even taking the bold step of scrapping their performance appraisal
systems and replacing them with a process of coaching and mentoring
for continual performance improvement.